Thursday, July 26, 2012
Wednesday, July 18, 2012
Physical Beauty
"I believe Satan is aware of the great power we have through faith in Christ's glory. I believe that ancient enemy works to coerce us to prefer the visually stunning to faith. By design he has clouded eyes of faith with eye candy. Satan wants you to prefer your HDTV and retina display to things that nurture your faith. Satan hates when we behold the glory of Christ by faith. Unfortunately, his strategy seems to be working. Many today are more prone to enjoy the beauty of this world by sight than enjoy the glory of Christ by faith.
If you are hungry to see more of Christ's glory, here are a few suggestions. First, spend regular time in God's Word. Open the Scriptures on a mission to see the glory of Christ in His authoritative teaching, compassionate healing, powerful miracles, and humble sacrifice. Let the Old Testament show you the glory of Christ in the promises, prophecies, and predictions about who He would be and what He would accomplish. Let the rest of the New Testament show you the glory of Christ in His compassionate love for the world and glorious mission for His people.- By Andrew Hess
Second, spend time alone with God in prayer, pleading with Him to increase your faith and show you more of His glory. Create regular space and time to think about and meditate on the glory of Christ. Prayerfully set your heart on God's Word, enjoy more of Christ's glory and be swept up in joy unspeakable.
Therefore, since we are surrounded by so great a cloud of witnesses, let us also lay aside every weight, and sin which clings so closely, and let us run with endurance the race that is set before us, looking to Jesus, the founder and perfecter of our faith, who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is seated at the right hand of the throne of God. "
Thursday, July 05, 2012
Tuesday, July 03, 2012
Bible Study
I love studying the Bible. It is one of my favorite things to do. For the last ten years, I have more or less faithfully studies Scriptures, and I think that it has paid off mightily. I love this verse: "Physical training has some value, but godliness has value for all things, holding promise for the present life and also for the
life to come." 1 Timothy 4:8
I am almost done with another Beth Moore Bible study, which will be probably my 8th or 9th, with a few repeats here and there. Next, I want to start studying on my own. My friend Barbara is a great example for me. When she was in high school, she started writing Bible Studies for her sister. Now she is a bona fide scripture scholar, speaks Greek and Hebrew (!) and is getting her Master's degree from a renowned Bible college in Southern California.
This summer a friend and I are leading a Bible study for female interns on Capitol Hill. We decided to study the women in the Bible, and have so far studied Eve, Sarah, Deborah, Esther, and Ruth. The coolest part is that we decided not to follow a book but to come up with the study questions on our own, letting the Word of God speak for itself. I had never done this before, but it has worked really well.
I am also in a Bible study at my church where we are going through the book of Hebrews, chapter by chapter. It is really challenging, and we are studying the scripture and its text alone. It is really helpful.
I decided that as soon as I finish my current Bible study material, I am going to start studying Scripture topically, and my first subject will be "sin." I think it will be interesting to enter into that study for a few weeks and see what the whole of Scripture has to say about it. I pray that God moves my heart and washes me white as snow through the course of the reading.
I am almost done with another Beth Moore Bible study, which will be probably my 8th or 9th, with a few repeats here and there. Next, I want to start studying on my own. My friend Barbara is a great example for me. When she was in high school, she started writing Bible Studies for her sister. Now she is a bona fide scripture scholar, speaks Greek and Hebrew (!) and is getting her Master's degree from a renowned Bible college in Southern California.
This summer a friend and I are leading a Bible study for female interns on Capitol Hill. We decided to study the women in the Bible, and have so far studied Eve, Sarah, Deborah, Esther, and Ruth. The coolest part is that we decided not to follow a book but to come up with the study questions on our own, letting the Word of God speak for itself. I had never done this before, but it has worked really well.
I am also in a Bible study at my church where we are going through the book of Hebrews, chapter by chapter. It is really challenging, and we are studying the scripture and its text alone. It is really helpful.
I decided that as soon as I finish my current Bible study material, I am going to start studying Scripture topically, and my first subject will be "sin." I think it will be interesting to enter into that study for a few weeks and see what the whole of Scripture has to say about it. I pray that God moves my heart and washes me white as snow through the course of the reading.
Thursday, June 28, 2012
Love It or Lose It
I am trying a new method of going through my clothes. Several years ago I decided to toss any item of clothing that I never or rarely wear, that had a prominent color or pattern that was not the most flattering, and that was ill fitting, unless I was willing to pay for alterations. That got rid of a lot of clothes.
Then there are some that still linger without my wearing them too often. Sometimes that is because they are "special" and cannot be worn casually. But there are others that sit on hangers week after month after year. I decided today to pick an item and either "wear it or toss it." If I cannot find a way to wear a particular item, it goes in the Good Will bin. If I decide after a day of wearing it that it is not something I love, then I will donate the garment to charity.
Either way, I must make a decision every day to "love it or lose it," or "wear it or lose it." If you see me wearing something that you don't think is particularly nice, please let me know, I really am trying to weed out things that aren't extra special.
Then there are some that still linger without my wearing them too often. Sometimes that is because they are "special" and cannot be worn casually. But there are others that sit on hangers week after month after year. I decided today to pick an item and either "wear it or toss it." If I cannot find a way to wear a particular item, it goes in the Good Will bin. If I decide after a day of wearing it that it is not something I love, then I will donate the garment to charity.
Either way, I must make a decision every day to "love it or lose it," or "wear it or lose it." If you see me wearing something that you don't think is particularly nice, please let me know, I really am trying to weed out things that aren't extra special.
Wednesday, June 27, 2012
The Age-Old Debate: Can Women 'Have it All?'
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/07/why-women-still-can-8217-t-have-it-all/9020/?single_page=true
This is a long article but the gist of it: can you be both a good professional employee and a good mother and wife? The article discusses how hard it is, and possibly impossible, to "have it all."
I guess I don't really have any practical thoughts on what it would be like to be an employee and a mother. But I want to have the mindset that I am not called to "have it all" but to "have Him all."
This is a long article but the gist of it: can you be both a good professional employee and a good mother and wife? The article discusses how hard it is, and possibly impossible, to "have it all."
I guess I don't really have any practical thoughts on what it would be like to be an employee and a mother. But I want to have the mindset that I am not called to "have it all" but to "have Him all."
The only thing I "want" is to stand before the face of God; my career and my family life is only in service to Him. So there can never be a conflict, ultimately. It may seem that way, but at every juncture, I will just choose Him and the rest will take care of itself. I don't want to 'have it all.' I just want to 'have Him all.' I merely have to lay down my personal desires in service to Him..."I have been crucified with Christ. It is no longer I who live but Christ who lives in me."
I know this is an extremely spiritual answer, but at the end of the day, I trust in God's sovereignty and I want to put Him completely in charge of my life and my will. This song lyric below shows how we don't have to choose between "having it all" if we singleheartedly choose the One right thing and let him direct our lives. There is no conflict.
I'm giving you my heart, and all that is within
I lay it all down for the sake of you my King
I'm giving you my dreams, I'm laying down my rights
I'm giving up my pride for the promise of new life
And I surrender all to you, all to you
Ultimately, where God guides he provides the will and the way to make things work.
Monday, June 25, 2012
Habits and Destiny
"The long practice of Christian habits embeds faith, hope, and love so deeply within a human life that they can preserve our lives and our character and predict our future activity."
"We are becoming who we will be . . . "
—Dallas Willard
"What shapes who we will become? According to Charles Duhigg, "becoming" happens through a three-step habit loop: cue, routine, and reward. In his The Power of Habit: Why We Do What We Do in Life and Business (Doubleday Canada, 2012), Duhigg provides scores of examples of habits that have revolutionized individual lives and entire corporations. Habits have helped sedentary, unhealthy smokers kick the cigarettes, start exercising, and become fit, healthy people. Habits helped the Indianapolis Colts, a once-failing professional football team, become Super Bowl Champions. Habits revitalized Alcoa, a once-ailing aluminum manufacturer, transforming it into a Dow Jones top performer. From individual to corporate life, habits manifest change and perpetuate behaviours that shape our lives.
Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Who Gets the Real Presence, and Who Says?
As someone who now attends a Catholic Church and chooses to abide by the rules and perimeters established by the Church for the good of the flock, I continue to hear many people share that the reason they ascribe to Catholicism is because of the Eucharist. They claim that the Eucharist is the Real Presence, the body, blood, soul, and divinity of Jesus. Further, they claim that the Catholic Church is the only church that can enact transubstantiation because of their direct line of Apostolic succession. Apparently, people--many people--convert to Catholicism to partake of this Holy meal.
This is interesting to me, having been part of the Catholic Church all my life, as well as the Evangelical Free Church, Non-denominational Bible Churches, and the Anglican Church. I celebrated communion and remembered the Last Supper through the body and blood, bread and wine, frequently, in all of these churches. Never did I believe that the bread and wine was not the Real Presence of Christ. While I didn't think too much about it at the time, my default thought was that the elements were the true body and blood of Christ. I assume that many of the other members of those churches didn't consider what they were consuming merely symbolic, either. For the vast majority of Jesus-seekers, regardless of denomination or church affiliation, they view participating in Communion as in fact consuming the body and blood of Jesus, just as He stated emphatically at the Last Supper. To be clear--I have never been a member of a reformed or Baptist church, so I can't speak for their doctrine on Communion-- but in the churches I have experienced, I never considered Communion as a symbol but as the reality of the Eucharist.
This leaves the big question: is "thinking" one way enough? Is it the Real Presence because I think it is, or because the Church says it is, or because the right Priest of the right denomination makes the correct gestures and says the right words over the elements? I don't think so: it is the Real Presence because God makes it so...it is his spiritual law, and he can create and enact the great mystery at his will. Did I consume the Real Presence at my Anglican, Evangelical Free, and Non-denominational churches? I think so. But only God knows.
This is interesting to me, having been part of the Catholic Church all my life, as well as the Evangelical Free Church, Non-denominational Bible Churches, and the Anglican Church. I celebrated communion and remembered the Last Supper through the body and blood, bread and wine, frequently, in all of these churches. Never did I believe that the bread and wine was not the Real Presence of Christ. While I didn't think too much about it at the time, my default thought was that the elements were the true body and blood of Christ. I assume that many of the other members of those churches didn't consider what they were consuming merely symbolic, either. For the vast majority of Jesus-seekers, regardless of denomination or church affiliation, they view participating in Communion as in fact consuming the body and blood of Jesus, just as He stated emphatically at the Last Supper. To be clear--I have never been a member of a reformed or Baptist church, so I can't speak for their doctrine on Communion-- but in the churches I have experienced, I never considered Communion as a symbol but as the reality of the Eucharist.
This leaves the big question: is "thinking" one way enough? Is it the Real Presence because I think it is, or because the Church says it is, or because the right Priest of the right denomination makes the correct gestures and says the right words over the elements? I don't think so: it is the Real Presence because God makes it so...it is his spiritual law, and he can create and enact the great mystery at his will. Did I consume the Real Presence at my Anglican, Evangelical Free, and Non-denominational churches? I think so. But only God knows.
Wednesday, June 06, 2012
Big Problem
I am guilty on all counts! Lord, have mercy!
There are six things the Lord hates, seven that are detestable to Him:
There are six things the Lord hates, seven that are detestable to Him:
- haughty eyes
- a lying tongue
- hands that shed innocent blood
- a heart that devises wicked schemes
- feet that are quick to rush into evil
- a false witness who pours out lies
- and a person who stirs up conflict in the community.
Thursday, May 31, 2012
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Breathtaking Reflection on the Wings of God
Dear Friends, this morning I read
the following reflection on God's wings. I had never considered this
before, but from now on, every time I lay my head on my feather pillow
or pull up my warm and snuggly down blanket in the cold weather, I will
remember the protective and glorious wings of our great Heavenly Father.
I hope this moves you like it did me today. Be Blessed! Love, Juliet
He will cover you with his feathers, and under his wings you will find refuge; his faithfulness will be your shield and rampart. -Psalm 91:4
Keep me as the apple of your eye; hide me in the shadow of your wings. -Psalm 17:8
Because you are my help, I sing in the shadow of your wings. -Psalm 63:7
Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those sent to you, how often I have longed to gather your children together as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, and you were not willing. -Matthew 23:37
He will cover you with his feathers, and under his wings you will find refuge; his faithfulness will be your shield and rampart. -Psalm 91:4
Keep me as the apple of your eye; hide me in the shadow of your wings. -Psalm 17:8
Because you are my help, I sing in the shadow of your wings. -Psalm 63:7
Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those sent to you, how often I have longed to gather your children together as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, and you were not willing. -Matthew 23:37
“How perfectly Christ portrays the nurturing wings of El Shaddai, the Caregiver. God’s wings covered His children with safety, security, joy and affection. In His perfect parenting, God is both paternal and maternal, both the loving disciplinarian and the nurturing protector who covers His children with His life.
“An article in National Geographic several years ago provided a penetrating picture of God’s wings. After a forest fire in Yellowstone National Park, forest rangers began their trek up a mountain to assess the inferno’s damage. One ranger found a bird literally petrified in ashes, perched statuesquely on the ground at the base of a tree. Somewhat sickened by the eerie sight, he knocked over the bird with a stick. When he struck it, three tiny chicks scurried from under their dead mother’s wings. The loving mother, keenly aware of impending disaster, had carried her offspring to the base of the tree and had gathered them under her wings, instinctively knowing that the toxic smoke would rise. She could have flown to safety but had refused to abandon her babies. When the blaze had arrived and the heat had singed her small body, the mother had remained steadfast. Because she had been willing to die, those under the cover of her wings would live.
“He shall cover thee with his feathers, and under his wings shalt thou trust.”-Psalm 91:4. Learn to experience the warmth and protection of life beneath the wings of the almighty.”
--Beth Moore, A Woman’s Heart: God’s Dwelling Place
Great Op-Ed on the State of Women in the Republican Party
Tuesday, May 15, 2012
Instructions
I remember an idyllic time in my life several years ago now, where I really felt the power of the following verse:
Is any one of you in trouble? He should pray. Is anyone happy? Let him sing songs of praise. (James 5:13)
I was really, really happy; there were no clouds on the horizon or in the past. We all have seasons of this. There was nothing troubling me to pray about. I needed to remember that it is in that period that I must sing songs of praise, and give thanks! That is the other side of the pendulum of asking for help or for your needs. Give thanks!!
Today I read the following, and it also provides a full range of instructions for any of life's stages..whether in a stage of hope, affliction, or prayer.
Be joyful in hope, patient in affliction, faithful in prayer. (Romans 12:12)
Is any one of you in trouble? He should pray. Is anyone happy? Let him sing songs of praise. (James 5:13)
I was really, really happy; there were no clouds on the horizon or in the past. We all have seasons of this. There was nothing troubling me to pray about. I needed to remember that it is in that period that I must sing songs of praise, and give thanks! That is the other side of the pendulum of asking for help or for your needs. Give thanks!!
Today I read the following, and it also provides a full range of instructions for any of life's stages..whether in a stage of hope, affliction, or prayer.
Be joyful in hope, patient in affliction, faithful in prayer. (Romans 12:12)
Thursday, May 10, 2012
Tuesday, May 08, 2012
Pro Choice Obama Administration Requires Registration of Unborn Babies in Security Process
This afternoon, I started noticing a few people posting
articles on Facebook about the pro-choice White House’s policy toward unborn children who
will be visiting the White House with their parent(s). I gave it half a laugh,
noting the irony. A few hours later, the staff assistant in my office
forwarded me an email from the White House Visitor’s Center. I am pasting it
below:
From: FN-WHO-Visitors
Office
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 8:18 AM
To: FN-WHO-Visitors Office
Subject: Tuesday Tidbits!
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 8:18 AM
To: FN-WHO-Visitors Office
Subject: Tuesday Tidbits!
Hi Hill!
A big Happy Birthday to San
Francisco Giants legendary centerfielder Willie Mays who turned 81 on Sunday!
OK, now back to work. We have received a number of
calls regarding how to enter security information for a baby that has not yet
been born.
Crazy as it may sound, you MUST include the baby in
the overall count of guests in the tour. It’s an easy process.
The baby’s security information should be entered as
follows:
·
LAST NAME: The family’s last name
·
FIRST NAME: “Baby” as a first name
·
MIDDLE NAME: NMN as in No Middle Name
·
DOB: Use the date you are submitting the request
to us as their birthday
·
GENDER: if the parents know put that gender down
if not, you can enter either M or F as we’ll ask you to update it at the time
of birth
·
SOCIAL: As they will not have a SSN and are
under 18, you will not need to enter this field. Again if the spreadsheet
asked for a social enter 9 zero’s (not the word nine zeros but 000000000 and
yes it happens!)
·
CITIZEN/CITY/STATE: The citizen, city and state
should be entered the same as the parents
|
Last_Name
|
First_Name
|
MI
|
DOB
|
SSN
|
Citizen
|
Country
|
Gender
|
City
|
State
|
|
Smith
|
Baby
|
NMN
|
5/9/2012
|
Y
|
US
|
F
|
Washington
|
DC
|
Once, the baby is born, you should send an email to the VO
inbox with the tour request ID number, the baby’s given name, their actual birthday
and gender. We can then update the newborn guest’s information within our
system. Please note that any changes to security information for newborns must
be made at least 48 hours in advance.
Keep being awesome!
E****
E*** S******
Director, Visitors Office
The White House
“This White House is yours!”
First Lady Michelle Obama
Thursday, May 03, 2012
The Sleight of Perspective
We see things not
as they are, but as we are. -- John Milton
![]() |
| Do you see the old woman or the young woman? |
In
2011, I learned a difficult but essential life lesson in perspective. Someone
shared with me the following quote, which I now try to keep at the forefront of
my thought processes in interpersonal relationships: “We see things not as they
are, but as we are.[i]”
In this essay, I will draw from a literary strategy to convey the drastically
disparate conclusions drawn from two or more perspectives, a biblical mandate to
treat others as one desires to be treated, a social contract theory of
authority and government, and also posit the dangers of judgment when operating
in the schema of one’s own perspective. Ultimately, we must extend the benefit
of the doubt to those who hurt us, offer grace, mercy, and forgiveness
unconditionally where wrong has occurred, and most of all seek to understand
before looking to be understood[ii].
This is the only loving and Christ-like response to offenses, great and small.
Weaving
a story through the lens of differing characters or images is a powerful means
to communicate that the same event in the same space and time can be
interpreted radically differently by different people. Where one may see a
scene, conversation, or image and impute one meaning, someone else will see
something differently. This is most simply portrayed by the dualistic images
that simultaneously show both an old woman and a young woman, for example, and
different individuals will naturally see different elements and design in the
image. It can be difficult for the individual to find the alternate image after
the first is already impressed in his or her mind.
In Atonement,[iii]
author Ian McEwen effectively spins a scene that occurs between an adult man
and woman struggling insignificantly over a vase that then breaks and falls
into a fountain. The woman sheds her outer garments and climbs into the
fountain to fetch the broken glass pieces. The man stands in observation,
shocked and taken aback by her unexpected and indecorous behavior. The reader
receives the story first, “objectively,” receiving the scope and the facts of
the situation.
At
the same time, a young, naïve and impressionable girl is watching, unbeknownst
to the actors. She constructs a fantasy about the interaction involving her
older sister (the woman) and the family’s gardener’s son (the man). While not
inherently harmful at this time, the fantasy hardens into a reality for the
young girl, who does not grasp the nature of romance and attraction between the
sexes. This basis for her ongoing observation of the man and woman does spiral
into dangerous and fallacious accusations that will later cause grave harm to
the innocent man. The girl observes a later physical romantic encounter between
her sister and the man, attributes violence and brutality to him, and when an
unrelated murder or rape occurs, accuses him of committing the violent act, and
he is found guilty based on her testimony.[iv]
In this case, the girl’s erroneous misperception causes lasting and irreversible
harm and injustice to an innocent person. Her following unachievable quest for
“Atonement” is the namesake of the book; one can never atone for such an error,
no matter how innocently made, in this life.
While
drawing conclusions based on one’s perceptions seldom have extreme consequences
such as are found in this masterful story, the lesson to be learned is that, by
no fault of one’s own, one’s perceptions are necessarily colored by age,
experience, intuitiveness, culture, and innumerable other factors. One must be
judicious in maintaining awareness that their sensory and experiential
observations are filtered through self; the most effective way to overcome
barriers of personal perception is to be self-critical of our subconscious and
aware of our limitations.
We
are given the following Biblical mandate in the Golden Rule: “In
everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up
the Law and the Prophets.[v]” This is the rule and the benchmark for our interpersonal relationships:
how we speak to others, share sensitive information, praise or criticize, and
how we treat other people’s property. Each person should behave in every
possible situation toward others in a manner that would please and bless
himself or herself: love your neighbor as yourself.
Inevitably,
though, this will lead to conflict, as every person will have particularities
and differences in how they wish to be treated. One individual may want to be
always “drawn out” into conversation, where another may desire to be left to
his or her thoughts. Individuals may have different standards of reasonableness
for household chores and duties. When each individual treats others and their
objects as that individual would want his or herself and objects to be treated,
one will encounter conflicts, bruised sensibilities, and problems. This is not
a matter of disrespect, laziness, or acrimony, but is a true and honest result
of someone trying merely to follow the sensitivities and standards one imposes
on and desires for one’s own self.
The
Golden Rule as applied to human beings as social creatures also necessitates
authority, hierarchy, and rule enforcement on a large scale. Man in its natural
state of nature, absent hierarchy and authority and governance, will encounter
incontrovertible conflict. John Locke has one of the most positive views of
human nature, and his social contract theory is based on the notion that man,
pursing his own good interests in a generous and benevolent manner will still
encounter deep conflicts. One man pursuing his interests, respectful of others,
will at some point conflict with another man pursuing his interests, respectful
of his neighbors. This is why an arbiter is needed, and a centralized authority
and system of rules arise to govern the conflict when two well-intentioned
neighbors reach an intractable conflict. This is where government becomes
necessary, and can be limited to instances in which cooperation must be
brokered and enforced between two “good” interests that have reached a
standoff.
Even
with the best intentions, and following the Golden Rule according to one’s best
understanding of how others want to be treated (based on how one wants to be
treated), conflicts still arise. Everyone will be on both ends of this dilemma
at one point or another, whether it is
the person feels “picked on” by another’s well-intentioned attempt to “solve
their problems,” or the person who is accused of a motive he or she is truly
innocent of or oblivious to. It is
therefore harmful to relationships and limiting to oneself to draw judgments
and conclusions as to another’s behavior without seeking to understand their
perspective and motive. The truism goes: seek to understand rather than be
understood. Sometimes people are motivated by selfish desires or the intention
to hurt another, but often times they are not. It is the duty of one person to
another to understand his or her perspective before casting judgment.
There
are few things more damaging to relationships between lovers and friends,
parents and siblings, than the offended party projecting motives upon the other
person(s) and being unwilling to entertain alternative perspectives, reasons,
and motives behind the offense. Many times the offense may have been
unintentional, or the motives were far removed from the intent to hurt the
injured party. An unwillingness on the part of the offended to engage and
extend the benefit of the doubt to the perpetrator of the offense is unloving
and unkind, the gravest transgression in any relationship. Reserving judgment and
maintaining openness to alternative explanations and the other person’s
perspective is absolutely fundamental in a healthy interpersonal relationship
of any kind.
Most
relational issues can be greatly resolved and reconciliation achieved when
individuals approach a situation where an offense has occurred with a
willingness to examine the perspective of another person. When an individual engaged
in a conflict holds the mindset that “we see things not as they are, but as we
are,” one maintains a comportment and orientation toward grace, mercy, and
understanding—the building blocks of personal healing and wholeness. These are the elements of the gift that Jesus
Christ extended to us when we stood before him blackened by our sinful nature.
Without
Christ’s grace, mercy, and forgiveness, we don’t have the capacity to offer the
same to our brothers and sisters. If we claim his grace, mercy, and
forgiveness, however, we must without exception unconditionally offer the same
to our brothers and sisters. As brothers and sisters, though we may tiff and
squabble with one another, it is beholden on us to seek out the perspectives of
others to enhance and fortify our own understanding and achieve reconciliation.
Failure to do so violates the Golden Rule and keeps one trapped in the limits
of one’s own perception and perspective. This is a barrier and cage of
ignorance preventing personal growth and development in wisdom, insight, and
understanding. Dear God, please explode
the myopic little boxes of our minds and let us enter into communion, empathy,
compassion, and understanding of the perspectives of others.
[i]
(John Milton, Paradise Lost).
[ii]
(Proverbs 18:13: He who answers before listening--that is his folly and his
shame; Also, St. Francis of Assisi: Prayer)
[iii]
Ian McEwen: NOTE- I have only begun reading this book, so any analysis is based
on a small portion of the text and what I assume will come.
[iv]
Again, I have not read this far into the book, but based on what I know of it,
this is not too far from the plot. Regardless of how true it is to the book, it
is a fascinating story and endpoint for the misperception.
[v]
Matthew 7:12, NIV
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




